Kashag's Statement Concerning Dholgyal
(Cabinet of the Tibetan
Government in Exile - Dharamsala - May 31, 1996)
After nearly
forty years in exile under the leadership of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, the
chances of achieving our goal of freedom for Tibet continues to improve.
Tibetans stand out among all the refugees in the world for their unique
achievements. This is no doubt the result of the Tibetan people's courage and
perseverance in attempting to restore the freedom of their country, which they
enjoyed for more than two thousand years of its recorded history. However, we
are yet to achieve the ultimate triumph. Obstructive factors of various kinds,
emanating from beings of both the form and formless realms, continue to hinder
our efforts.
His Holiness the Dalai Lama has
investigated these obstructions and their causes for many years. One of the
findings of his investigations is that depending on the spirit, Dholgyal,
otherwise known as Dorje Shugden or Gyalchen Shugden, conflicts with Tibet's
two protector-deities (Nechung and Palden Lhamo) as well as the protector-deity
of the Gelugpa tradition, Pledge-holding Dharmaraja (Damchen Choegyal). The
inclination of this spirit is to harm, rather than benefit, the cause of Tibet.
Understanding this, His Holiness the Dalai Lama himself made
a complete break with the Dolgyal in 1976. Since then, His Holiness has
regularly explained to the Tibetan people why depending on the Dolgyal was
inappropriate. Many Lamas, abbots, geshes, as well as the general Tibetan
public, both lay and ordained, heeded his advice and stopped propitiating
Dolgyal. As a result, the Tibetan situation has taken a turn for the better.
However, some people have continued to propitiate Dolgyal,
either because they failed to appreciate the threat it poses to the Tibetan cause
or because they have decided to disregard it. There are yet others who not only
propitiate Dolgyal themselves, but also actively encouraged others to follow
suit. This has impaired the sacred relationship between the people of Tibet and
their protector-deities. Today, this is one of the greatest dangers to the
cause of Tibet and the life of His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
During this spring teaching this year, His Holiness the
Dalai Lama said that it was very important at this point in our struggle that
the people and protector-deities of Tibet maintain a harmonious relationship
based on their mutual commitments to each other. He repeated what he had
declared on many previous occasions that just as a person's breach of honor can
create difficulties, so can a breach of commitments among the
protector-deities. He reiterated that what he has previously announced remains
unchanged. He conceded that restrictions on Dolgyal would not apply to any
monastery, lama's household or private individual who has no concern for the
general interest of Tibet. His Holiness made this absolutely clear.
His Holiness clearly explained the point again on 21st
March 1996 during the preparatory ritual for the Very Secret Hayagriva (Tamding
Yang-sang) empowerment. He said: "Recently I have conducted a number of
prayers for the well being of our nation and religion. It has become fairly
clear that Dolgyal is a spirit of the dark forces. Therefore, during the
Hayagriva invocation last year, I specifically mentioned Dolgyal by name and an
incantation was made to ward him off." He continued: "I wonder if any
among you here today continue to propitiate Dolgyal and still feel comfortable
receiving this Hayagriva empowerment. This is the reason why I suggested
yesterday that it would not be appropriate for those who propitiate Dolgyal to
attend this empowerment. When the protector concerned is disloyal to its
commitments, the person concerned becomes disloyal in turn. As I said
yesterday, this gives rise to a breach of commitments which carries with it a
definite threat to the life of a Lama.
"If any among you here are determined to continue
propitiating Dolgyal, it would be better for you to stay away from this
empowerment, get up and leave this place. It is improper for you to continue to
sit here. It will not benefit you. On the contrary it will have the effect of
reducing the life span of Gyalwa Rinpoche (The Dalai Lama), which is not good.
However, if there are any among you who hope that Gyalwa Rinpoche will soon
die, then you can stay." Therefore rejecting Dolgyal has become a matter
of the highest importance to the cause of Tibet, which is dependent on the
personal security of His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
His Holiness also remarked: "The biography of His
Holiness the Great Fifth Dalai Lama contains a reference to discord between him
and Tulku Drakpa Gyaltsen (whose spirit is alleged to have become Dolgyal). The
matter is made very clear in the Great Fifth's Extensive Collection of Secrets
(Sangwang Gyachen). On the basis of this evidence, the 13th Dalai Lama imposed
restrictions on Dolgyal. I am a successor to the Great Fifth Dalai Lama and,
likewise, have a unique karmic relationship with the previous Dalai Lama. I
have therefore a duty to carry out the legacy of the Great Fifth and the 13th
Dalai Lama. This is my responsibility, although some people may not like it.
But then, this is not a matter of what is in the Dalai Lama's interest, but
what is in the interest of the Tibetan nation and its religion.
"When it comes to the interests of the Tibetan nation,
I will carry through to completion the work I have begun. I will not back off
because of a few disgruntled individuals. I am determined to implement the
conclusions of my careful research and will not let it be. In the great monastic
universities - Drepung, Sera and Ganden, the majority are faultless. However,
it is clear that a tiny number among them are stubborn. Even private
individuals may later have cause for regret if you take this lightly now in the
hope that perhaps things will turn out all right after all. ...Some of you feel
that your business and ability to earn a living do better if you propitiate
Dolgyal. This is ill-omened talk. It is an example as the notable lama and
writer Gung-thang Tshang remarked, of how we human beings end up embracing evil
friends."
Propitiating spirits is a practice originating in
pre-Buddhist Tibet. However, when Guru Padmasambhava was helping to establish
Buddhism in Tibet in the 8th century, He recruited some spirits such as
Nechung, the State Oracle, to protect the Buddhist doctrine. Due to his high
spiritual attainments, he was able to subdue such spirits and bind them by
oath. Propitiating of spirits, therefore, is not a Buddhist practice itself,
but a means to help sustain spiritual practice. Over the centuries the practice
of propitiating spirits has instead become widespread as a means to achieve
fame, fortune and the general well-being for this life, concerns that run
counter to general Buddhist outlook.
His Holiness has commented on this too: "Those who can
afford us protection and bounty in this life alone - be they humans, deities
and nagas, mountain-dwelling protectors, and so forth - are all objects for
whom we might feel compassion. There is no reason for holding them in awe. Seeking
refuge in them is a disgrace to the Geluk tradition. It is disgraceful to seek
refuge in such beings while failing to see benefit in the Six-armed Mahakala
(Gonpo Chagdrug) and Pledge-bound Dharmaraja (Damchen Choegyal), the worthy
appointed guardians of the immensely valuable teachings of Je Tsongkhapa."
Allaying any fears Tibetans may have about ceasing to propitiate Dolgyal, His
Holiness said: "Lamas, Geshes, religious students, and laity need not fear
that they will be harmed if they stop propitiating Dolgyal. Nothing will
happen. I will face the challenge. As Gelugpas, recite the migtse ma prayer, it
will be enough if you also recite the Condensed Extensive Praise to Dharmaraja
(Choegyal Gyi Toepa Kyangkumma). No harm will befall you."
It is the duty of the Tibetan Government-in-exile to
encourage compliance with any advice given out of concern for the cause of
Tibet, the security of its head of state and the honor of all Tibetan Buddhist
traditions including the Geluk tradition. Consequently, it has initiated a
programme to be prevailing upon those still following Dolgyal to make a break
with it. We are doing so out of concern for the greater welfare of Tibet and so
that the Gelugpa teachings of Je Tsongkhapa remain pure. Representatives
visited Tibetan religious seats in South India to read out His Holiness the
Dalai Lama's statements. Most people with connections to Dolgyal have come to
understand that propitiating him undermines the cause of Tibet, compromises the
personal security of His Holiness the Dalai Lama and brings harm to the
individual propitiator himself or herself. Many of them stood up amidst the
assembly of Lamas, Geshes, and the general body of monks to state that they
were giving it up. Likewise, many letters undertaking to cease propitiating
Dolgyal have arrived from monasteries, public and private organizations and the
general public. We consider this an acceptance of responsibility for the
greater good of Tibet.
However, a few Lamas, Geshes, lay people and organizations
have adopted an extremist posture and continue to follow Dolgyal thinking that
what they are doing accords with Gelugpa practice. Besides these, a handful of
people are seeking to exploit the issue to create discord within the Tibetan
community. They are spreading baseless rumors and accusations in the
international community, thereby playing into the enemy's hands. We, therefore,
request them to stop.
His Holiness the Dalai Lama has raised concern about the
question of propitiating Dolgyal only because it has a great bearing on the
cause of Tibet. It is precisely because of this that he has conducted extensive
research and investigation on the matter for more than two decades. He
explained his findings to his tutor, Kyabje Yongzin Trijang Rinpoche. The tutor
graciously acceded to it, acknowledging that the findings were entirely
faultless. This should be firmly borne in mind by all concerned.
In one of his recent statements His Holiness said:
"You should not think that dangers to my life come only from someone armed
with a knife, a gun, or a bomb. Such an event is extremely unlikely. But
dangers to my life may arise if my advice is constantly spurned, causing me to
feel discouraged and to see no further purpose in living." In subsequent
statement, he said: "I am now a man in his sixties. Owing to some merit
accumulated in my past lives, I do not see any substantial danger to my life.
...In the light of the Tibetan people's plight and the tragic situation in
Tibet, I will try to live long so that I can share in their sufferings and
console them as well as I can. Apart from that, I have no personal interests
whatsoever." All Tibetans should think hard about this both as individuals
and communities.
It is pointless to pay lip-service to religious freedom and
democracy if a lack of trust amongst us undermines our cause and the personal
security of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. There is no question of His Holiness
the Dalai Lama ever trampling upon or neglecting any aspect of religious
freedom. In fact, no one has ever attempted to prevent any Tibetan from
embracing Buddhism or a non-Buddhist religion, or any school of Tibetan
Buddhism. This is why Christians, Muslims, followers of the four great
traditions of Tibetan Buddhism and Bön enjoy complete religious liberty in the Tibetan
community. What needs to be stressed here is that there never has been, nor
could there be, any attempt to impose Buddhist, Christians and Muslims.
Similarly, religious freedom has never been used as a pretext to impose Kagyu,
Sakya or Geluk doctrines and practices on Nyingma monasteries. On the contrary,
there is a law which lays down that Christians and Muslims should follow their
own respective religious doctrines and practices and that the doctrines of
other religions, and practices inconsistent with their own character should not
be imposed on these religious centres. This is a spiritual tradition that
accords with the principles of democracy and freedom.
According to Tibetan religious tradition, it is the
responsibility of the founding lama or leader of monastery of any sect to give
spiritual guidance as to what guardian protector, practices and doctrines the
monastery should follow. But monks of the monastery do not question that
guidance in the name of religious freedom. His Holiness the Dalai Lama is the
supreme religious and temporal head of Tibet. It is his responsibility, in his
capacity as the spiritual leader, to give spiritual guidance for the benefit of
the Tibetan people. As the temporal head of Tibet, it is his responsibility to
give political direction to the Tibetan people and to seek to restrain
activities that would bring harm to the cause of Tibet. Fulfilling his
responsibility in this way cannot amount to a violation of religious and
democratic freedoms.
The essence of His Holiness' advice is this:
"Propitiating Dolgyal does great harm to the cause of Tibet. It also
imperils the life of the Dalai Lama. Therefore, it is totally inappropriate for
the great monasteries of the Gelug tradition, the Upper and Lower Tantric Monasteries
and all other affiliated monasteries which are national institutions ever to
propitiate Dolgyal. The public should be thoroughly informed so that they can
gain a clear appreciation of the situation themselves. However, everyone is
completely free to say: "If the cause of Tibet and the Dalai Lama's life
are undermined so be it. We have religious freedom. We are a democracy. We are
free to do as we please. We will not change our tradition of propitiating
Dolgyal." The overwhelming majority of the Tibetan people will remain
steadfast, keeping in mind the greater good of the Tibetan cause, and
contribute as best as they can to fulfill His Holiness the Dalai Lama's wishes.
Nevertheless, it is quite clear that far from restricting religious freedom,
the choice is left open to the individual concerned.